By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:
I was actually not being genuine from the moment I first responded to Parokki. The last sentence of that post should have been a dead give away. You still took the bait... hook, line, and sinker.
(Boldface added)

It wasn't a troll.


I would suggest that you revisit the definition of "troll".

P.S. Are you still trolling? Because your responses have been so contradictory that I have trouble believing that such an articulate poster as yourself would put forth such an incoherent position.

It wasn't meant start an argument per se, merely spark some amusing discussion which it was right up towards the end of it however it has soured rather quickly.  I have no interest in discussions which cease to be amusing.  Besides, were I trolling I wouldn't still be in this thread now would I?

tarheel91 said:

If you're such a masterful arguer, why are you attacking your opponent?  You should know that only makes you seem less credible.  Someone with any knowledge about arguing knows at least that much.

By the way, I know what a straw man argument is; the illustration was pretty useless.  You failed to apply it to any of my arguments.  You simply claimed I had done something of that sort.  Nice connection.



I'm attacking you because I'm not arguing anything at the moment.  I have yet to do so.  I have the sneaking suspicion I'm repeating myself though.  I wonder why...

I'm glad you know what a strawman argument is.  I'd be happy if you'd consider not making them.