By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
waron said:

yes, but it's still not healthy at all for users/gamers to use it on normal basis and considering that there's already a 3d technology made by sharp and samsung that doesn't have this problem and is much better(developed in late 2008/early 2009 that let's you watch 3d without glasses and from any point of view you would see a different thing) makes me wonder what were they thinking pushing this old 3D tech so much.
yes, it's much cheaper than sharp's technology, yes it's "bad" enough that they can release TVs with TRUE 3D 3 years later but, when the health problem will become well known fact to the public and we will see first effects of it they will be in deep shit.

Parallax barrier (sharp and samsung) glass free 3D doest produce the same depth of effect and doesnt make things stick out of the display. Only phillips glassless TVs works exactly like shutter glasses TV but it cost 10K + and need to have media program specifically for it since it use 4 time the normal resolution. Specialist thinks that, it will be viable as a consumer device in about 10 years. Right now its expensive and on the gaming side we dont have the hardware to push the resolution necessary for real glassless 3D to work.