| Akvod said: O.o $2000 for a watch? I understand that value can be put on for fashionability or brands, but O.o The main appeal I find with the iPad is that if it works just like the iPhone, it's a lot quicker and convenient to use than a Netbook or laptop. The down side I find with the iPad is that... well... it works just like the iPhone. It would have been nice if they really upgraded the OS to differentiate it from its predecessor more. |
It's pricy, but it looks nice. It's the only piece of jewelry I own, and it's made out of ceramic. It looks as new as the day I bought it 5 years ago. It will look the same in 20.
As for the iPad, it's not just a big iPhone. The problem is if you have never played with one, that's going to be your impression (and I guess where all the jokes come from).
The iPad is to the iPhone, as the desktop gaming rig is to the netbook. Yea, they run the same os, but what you do on one you can't really do well on the other.
When you start playing with the apps, see how blazing fast the thing is, and look at the screen, you realize just how different it is. Some people might not like tablets in general, and for them there is just nothing a company can produce in that form factor that people will like. But if a Tablet seems like the thing for you, the iPad does it right.
Android will too if a hardware company can make something like the iPad. The Slate from HP is not near as good from a hardware perspective. If HTC or some other high end phone manufacturer made a tablet, I think they could make something that rivales the iPad.
Bringing a proven touch interface from something proven (like the iPhone) to something more capable was the right move. The last 12 years or so that tablet PC's have been out has proven that moving from the desktop down is not.
