Adjudicator on 05 April 2010
Does anyone have any theories or evidence to suggest that this was done for any other reason than anti piracy.
I see some users asking what if they stop you from playing games or watching Blu Ray movies. This to me makes no sense as it's all about money and those things would cause them to lose money.
Piracy causes them to lose money. Whether or not it sets a precedent is irrelevant. The onus is on you the consumer to exercise your rights.
So again I ask, is there any other reason. Sometimes you have to step away from the cold hard facts and start using some common sense.
