By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
wholikeswood on 04 April 2010
Edit Thread
CGI-Quality said:
wholikeswood said:
CGI-Quality said:
wholikeswood said:
CGI-Quality said:

I saw this article and thought: I'm not touching it with a 100 ft pole.

He'd better lay off the Wii as it will continue to demolish his and Sony's precious babies at retail.

How Wii hardware is performing has absolutely nothing to do with what Greenberg was talking about (3rd party publisher success with the console).

I'm well aware of that, and it doesn't matter. I said nothing wrong. Why not ACTUALLY contribute to the conversation?

And why the Hell do you always stalk my posts?

You entered a thread about Wii 3rd party software, made an entirely irrelevant and gratuitous point about Wii hardware, and you're criticising my contribution?

Irony really is a wonderful thing.

Why are you so annoyed by it? He made a bold statement, yet ironically his console is being destroyed by the console he's speaking down about. Doesn't matter what he says, I acknowledge that.

Something tells me had I not added Sony in there, you wouldn't have bothered quoting me. You only stalk my posts when I say something against Sony.

It *would* be ironic if he were talking down about the Wii. But he's not; he's talking about Wii 3rd party software. You're trying to bring it all into the same bracket in order to make your first post seem relevant, but the truth is your first post wasn't pertinent and over-simplifying the situation (i.e. acting like a criticism of 3rd party software is the same as a criticism of the Wii console itself) won't change that.

And shame on you for taking the cheap option and trying to discredit me with the fanboy ad hominem, CGI; I thought you were better than that. You made an obviously off-topic and unnecessary point in defence of the Wii (no doubt to remind people how non-partisan you are, as equally pro-Wii as pro-PS3 and pro-360, etc, etc, etc), so I picked you up on it.