MontanaHatchet said:
It's pointless because it means so very little. Saying that left handed people have played a slightly statistically higher role in history than there are left handed people means nothing. Heck, the same pattern can be found on Vgchartz (more left handed people than the average), and you don't have to be creative or innovative to sign up for Vgchartz. These statistics mean nothing, and I'm sure that most of the people voting are just going with the most "original" option. Especially since there are suddenly a lot of ambidextrous people. And humans being are pointless? That is one dumb rebuttal. |
What does that have to do with anything? That people lie here doesn't mean other statistics are a lie as well. The fact that there's so many ambidextrous people here means that most people here don't have a clue what it really means.
And it's not a slightly higher role, it's big enough to actually make you wonder why it's like that. It's not so much the statistics that are important in this context, but what causes them to be like this. If stimulating different parts of your brain makes you achieve higher things then normal then I wouldn't call it pointless. Scientists are going to mess with the human brain one day anyway, whether we like it or not.
And my humans being pointless response isn't a dumb rebuttal. What I mean by that is that you don't decide what's pointless and what isn't.







