By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
thismeintiel on 02 April 2010
Edit Thread
dsister44 said:
Vetteman94 said:
dsister44 said:
thismeintiel said:
Well, sorry to get back on topic guys, LOL! But, I'm kinda curious if some of these 360 guys that don't even own a PS3 and are bashing Sony, are the same ones who defended MS when they were banning people from Live. Even though they had already paid for their system and Live. I mean I see no difference here.

You don't see the difference between Sony taking away features I paid for and pirates on XBL?


You can keep those features if you want,  you just cant use a service they provide to you for free

And that I can't play new games that are released after the update 

You honestly see a difference?  Do you have proof that the people who modded their 360's were pirates?  Did MS?  No.  They just knew they had modded their system, which as far as I know is not illegal.  Who knows why they did it.  Maybe to use HDD that MS didn't put out themselves.  Or to run Linux.  It doesn't really matter, they were refused a feature from MS, one they actually pay for (unlike PSN).  Or even worse, what about the banning of third-party memory cards just because they could POSSIBLY use them to hack the system.  Of course, this just hurts those who used them justly.  There is no difference.