By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
misterchoc90 on 01 April 2010
Edit Thread
Vetteman94 said:
EncodedNybble said:
Vetteman94 said:
dsister44 said:
thismeintiel said:
Well, sorry to get back on topic guys, LOL! But, I'm kinda curious if some of these 360 guys that don't even own a PS3 and are bashing Sony, are the same ones who defended MS when they were banning people from Live. Even though they had already paid for their system and Live. I mean I see no difference here.

You don't see the difference between Sony taking away features I paid for and pirates on XBL?


You can keep those features if you want,  you just cant use a service they provide to you for free

or play some PS3 games at some later point in time.

 

People were sold a device (assuming no modifications were done to it) that could play PS3 games, connect to the PSN and install certain distros of linux, that is what they should have, always.

And when you connected to the PSN you agreed to their Terms of Service,  which included the possibility of them removing features.  Not thier fault you didnt read it. 

So if I never connected my PS3 online, I would have never agreed to their Terms of Service?

Honestly , I don't understand how can some people agree with this. I bought the PS3 because it could both play all ps3 games and run Linux at any time. I did use Linux from time to time when my PC died, which it frequently does. Offcourse I'll still be able to play old games, but new ones will just be impossible.

If I wanted something that only played games I would've bought a 360 or a Wii. So basically, Sony stole me 400 euros, which I payed at the time. And I can imagine how mad the people who payed 600 when it came out with the intention of using both Linux and play games feel.

 

Btw, Hi. First post.