Vetteman94 said:
EncodedNybble said:
Vetteman94 said:
dsister44 said:
thismeintiel said:
Well, sorry to get back on topic guys, LOL! But, I'm kinda curious if some of these 360 guys that don't even own a PS3 and are bashing Sony, are the same ones who defended MS when they were banning people from Live. Even though they had already paid for their system and Live. I mean I see no difference here. |
You don't see the difference between Sony taking away features I paid for and pirates on XBL?
|
You can keep those features if you want, you just cant use a service they provide to you for free
|
or play some PS3 games at some later point in time.
People were sold a device (assuming no modifications were done to it) that could play PS3 games, connect to the PSN and install certain distros of linux, that is what they should have, always.
|
And when you connected to the PSN you agreed to their Terms of Service, which included the possibility of them removing features. Not thier fault you didnt read it.
|
yes, I agreed to the PSN ToS, that had nothing to do (from the large chunk of it I read) about anything to do with the PS3 itself nor did it mention "possibility of them removing features." I can understand the ability to revoke PSN access, because, that access is dependent on adhering to the ToS which can control the firmware needed to connect to it.
But playing PS3 games and having other O/S support were selling points to some people (like me) and removing features you paid money for, is BS. I think they should give me 10% of my purchase price back, then I'll be alright :)
