Icyedge said:
superchunk said:
Icyedge said:
superchunk said:
Icyedge said:
You dont even need competitor to use the term comeback. I clearly stated my point before, its not the biggest comeback ever, but still a comeback. I used as an example the image of the playstation brand. The image of the playstation with the PS2 was very good, positive word of mouth, good press. Then PS3 was exact opposite, negative word of mouth and press. Then the slim and 299$ price point, initiate a strong comeback for the playstation image.
The problem is, we cannot say its not a comeback, because I have just demonstrated it is one. What you could say is, they werent able to do a comeback in their ranking. Theres a difference there.
|
If you don't compare it to its competition then what does it have to have a comback against? Your point seems silly and not realistic.
|
Like ive just explain you can compare playstation popularity to 5 years ago to 3 years ago to now. And then say it did a comeback.
comeback [ˈkʌmˌbæk]
n Informal
1. a return to a former position, status, etc.
2. a return or response, esp recriminatory
3. a quick reply; retort
In this case im talking about it popularity status. Like I said previously you could say that it didnt make a comeback in ranking against his competitor. That was your point I think. My point was still good tho.
|
I understood your idea about a comeback of the brand. I just think that was silly and clearly not what someone would expect if you asked them if PS3 had made a comeback. Question should have been has Playstation made a comeback. Single out the PS3 and you must be referring to its position in this generation which is largly unchanged and thus the answer is still no.
|
The vote says something else.
|
ha haha, the vote is simply a popularity contest.
