CGI-Quality said:
What makes it so pathetic? What percentage of the human population will slit their wrists over this? What if it helps the PS3 by taking out the feature? What if this actually contributes to improving game performance? What if it's laying the foundation for some other useful feature? All things to consider before calling it pathetic. |
Don't spin this as being positive CGI, it isn't. The other OS feature I'm pretty sure will have zero memory imprint once the PS3 has booted into its gaming configuration. This is no foundation, its simply protecting their security. I agree its perhaps wrong to lambast Sony for doing this but then again had they not come out less than a month ago and guaranteed they would not disable the feature perhaps they wouldn't have got so many people annoyed and opinionated.
There is too many people on this site defending Sony over this instead of just accepting what they're doing is wrong. You don't promise one thing then deliver another. What feature would it take for them to remove before you accept this constant removal of features is not acceptable?
Had Microsoft done this then I would have criticized them too, funnily enough like many people did when they were forced to upgrade to NXE from the blades dash.
