Icyedge said:
Its pretty obvious cutting price was part of the plan to make PS3 more accessible. When you release a home console at 600$ you know that only your hardcore fan will purchase it. And then slowly cut the price to make it more accessible while not loosing too much money was the obvious plan. And yes since september it have outsold xbox so there goes your " The PS3 has not done either". With the growing interest in HD, 3D and blu-ray, the PS3 at 199$ (in 1-2 years) will sell like hotcake. PS3 still has a lot of potential sales. 299$ is not a pricetag for casual nor impulsive purchase. Its not because you prefer another console that you need to be blind and a hater. |
Blind and hater??
first of all: All consolesmakers dropped the price because they had too. I just said that Sony had the biggest need for it. Which is true.
By beating the Xbox360: i mean passing its' total numbers off course. What else?
With another 2 year (likely start of a new generation) there is little chance that the PS3 wil pass the Xbox360 numbers. Microsoft is really keen on keeping it that way.
Lastly:
By any measure, a comeback is not a comeback when your ranking doesn't change. That's true and accepted in any competition.
In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.







