Reviews are irrelevant,

[Soma]

Kilzoned82 said:
Reviews = opinions. Opinions are not facts. Every person has a different opinion. You can have an opinion on everything but know absolutely nothing.
Reviews = Opinions = Blah ,blah, blah.

 

This is the problem for me. Reviews should NOT be just opinions. If I wanted an opinion, then I'll ask my brother, friends or any person that knows my tastes. Reviews should be Professional opinions. The reviewer should give scores, not depending if he liked the game or not, but if he thinks the game is quality and will be appreciated by the target audience.

Say I'm a reviewer and hate FPS, I would not give CoD a 5 or something because I didn't like it, and things like that are happening with a lot of games, specially for Wii, because of the "casual" and "waggleee" stuff reviewers complain.

 

That's why for me, many reviews are irrelevant when the author gives high scores depending of the "production values" and incredible graphics, but other games with simpler designs give me more fun.