FF I 4/5 (remember people it was for the NES and had as much of a plot as Zelda at the time)
FF II 4.5/5 (buffed version of I)
FF III DS version 4/5 (Was a fun game with a mildly childish storyline)
FF IV 4.75/5 (I really enjoyed this game)
FF V ?/? Unplayed
FF VI 3/5 (Serriously a clown as the archvillian, no thanks)
FF VII 5/5 (By far the best in the series, if you dont think so you need a Lobotomy)
FF VIII 4.85/5 (I needed towns on disc 4)
FF IX 4.5/5 (Bahamut would have layed waste to Kuja)
FF X 5/5 (as with VII it builds a connection with the characters, xcellent game)
FF X-2 3/5 (It wasnt my cup of tea but it was fun)
FF XI 4.5/5 (Played it for 4 years, was very fun and sometimes very disheartening. Really great story)
FF XII 4.9/5 (Very fun and creative very good story)
FF XIII 5/5 so far only about 7 hours into it.
FF I to FF VI we made for the younger more innocent audience and they only had so much data they could apply to each of those titles.
It wasnt until FF VII that the average gamer had "Final Fantasy" etched into their vocabulary. From then on a much wider demograph was hooked and every RPG since is compared with it. All in all I recommend that everyone play games for themselves, do not take critic or blogger's words to heart. It is your experence that counts.
