By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KruzeS said:

Seriously dude? You really need to slow down.

Answering your comment though, yes, there's still a lot of people believing that, probably the same bunch that believes the Cell is great for AI. And, at the end of this generation, they'll be "proven" correct, cause since the Cell is in fact good at everything else a game does (physics simulation, geometry manipulation, etc) there will be more room for AI elsewhere. So this fallacy that AI is a big portion of what a game spends time with isn't anywhere near dieing off.



NOW I really cant'see anything with "advanced AI" in game market.

you say MAYBE in the future.

 

but people like you really can't understand that people don't buy console NOW to play games in 4 YEARS!!!

people buy console NOW to play games NOW!!!

 

people like you often speaks about super mega graphics or AI...

 

but looking at 5 years future a see PC games at 1600x1200!!!(poor ps3/x360 at 1080...)

I see PC with 8giga ram!!!

I see cpu with more core ad programmers trained to program parallel processes.

then in the end I see advanced Ai.

 

but NOW

 

where is advanced AI...????

 

listen me pal!!!

Still to come!!!

http://mind.sourceforge.net/standard.html