Jboy0990 said:
That doesn't make sense though.... how would a 5.8 turn to a 2* on ours? from my understanding if they go on a 10 scale our ratings should be half of what theirs is... and half of 5.8(or 6 in other words) would be 3*. If we are gonna use their ratings to determine our scale then it should be done properly. as I said before 1-2 should be a 1*, 3-4 a 2*, 5-6 a 3*, 7-8 a 4*, and 9-10 a 5*... Otherwise its not done right an ratings are therefore made up, or somebody needs a calculator |
I didn't say we were going to use their rating system. I merely pointed to those ratings to show what other people's opinions on the game's difficultly were in comparison to, for example, GoW. Those people are saying that they think GoW is a 5, and GoW 3 is a 5.8. So, GoW 3 is slightly harder than GoW. But if GoW 3 had a 6.5 or 7 difficultly rating on that site, and more importantly, others here agreed that it should be a 3* rating, then I would consider making it 3*. But most people here have been saying that it should be a 2* rating, and I think someone here even said it should be a 1* rating. Therefore, I made it a 2* rating. This may change as others play the game and comment on its difficultly, but for now, it's a 2* rating.
And to comment on your scale of "1-2 should be a 1*, 3-4 a 2*, 5-6 a 3*, 7-8 a 4*, and 9-10 a 5*". You're not going to find many games with an average difficulty rating of 1 or 2 on that site. There might be like 2 or 3 games that fall into this range. Following this scale, games like Sonic's Ultimate Genesis Collection would be rated as a 2* (it's currectly rated a 3/10 on that site).







