well good of war is a "hack n slash" so " reviewers" (retards) expect new combos, possibly diffrent platforming, and harder puzzles which will keep people stuck for an hour or two. Also they say how they wanted the game to be. Well i would have liked if gow3 was 100+ hourse, it isn't but i still gave it a 10/10.
They expect too much out of ps3 exclusives, their wasn't any "new" kind of game play in LFD2 but they didn't care. Ofcourse i wanted new combos in GOW3 we got new blades a shoulder bash and the ability to use an enemy as a battering ram, aslo 3 new weapons were added with diffrent weapons.
IGN, GAMESPOT, GAME TRAILERS, have bad reviewers.
i think that if you want to know the level of a game ask a couple of gamers ( 10-20)
Being in 3rd place never felt so good
