tombi123 said:
The poor guys did pretty well there and the two rich guys got pwned! You're going to have to explain why the two rich guys won... |
It's the "1/3rd" of there income was just given to them part... or at least I'd think so.
He's argueing that when you give people money rather then make them earn it. They're less likely to become good with money and therefore more likely to stay poor rather then now where the US is fairly dynamic when it comes to upword (and downward) mobility.
Those poor are now dependent on the government and the rich.
Right now the US is actually quite good when it comes to upword mobility.
Around 50% of the people in the lowest quintile will have moved into a higher quintile in 10 years. While in 10 years, only 25% of the top 1% will still be in the top 1%.








