By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Grey21 on 22 March 2010
Edit Thread
Profcrab said:
CGI-Quality said:
FaRmLaNd said:
ME2 is more polished but it removes a lot of RPG features and exploration features I loved in the first game.

Overall ME2 is probably a better game but then again you can't freely explore the citidel which was a huge disapointment because that was the best part about the original game in many ways.

A HUGE letdown for me. The sequel is definitely more enjoyable, but that kept it from totally winning over the original 100%.

As for Gears 3, yeah, if it's running on the new engine, I expect a massive technical upgrade.

I echo that.  The same thing happened with KotOR 2 (although it was developed by Obsidian).  Less expansive environments in some cases, more confined.  I really liked many of the changes in ME2 and it was overall a better game, but I didn't like some of the environmental changes.

I give that post a 9.7.


Less expansive environments? Ibstead of copy and pasting the old Citadel they took their time tocreate a new area. Sure it was smaller but the entire Citadel was unneeded everything on their could have been placed on another location. ME1 only had the Citadel, it was big (although small compaired to any city from Oblivion) but it was the only real city area in the game. ME2 has multible cities next to their new Citadel area. So less expansive environments? Perhaps but you should add that there are about 5 times more environments at the same time aswell.