Akvod said:
I think that the shotgun isn't reliable at all. If you can't get a 1 shot kill with it at close range then it's useless. The AK is the Assault's starting gun, are you referring to another gun? I believe getting players to try out new weapons temporarily is a good thing. But that's subjective opinion, and I respect your's. No, the early guns and later guns have their advantages and disadvantanges. In other words, they're balanced, nothing is better than the rest. The MG3 has extreme rate of fire, but isn't reliable at far range. Statisticly, it's not better than the M60 in everything, and vice versa. Again, statisticly speaking, the early guns are not inferior to the later. 3/4s of the gun aren't useless the F9000 is good for headshots and close range, the M416 is superior at closer range than the M16, the M16 alllows skilled people to get headshots, the AUG has a nice balance, etc. You can say that the early guns suck as a matter of opinion, but stasticly, they are not. |
The AK 74 or whatever. And it is NOT the starting gun at all. It is the 9A-91 or whatever and it sucks. As does the 2nd and 3rd gun. The AK is the 4th. There is absolutely NO advanatge to those first 3 guns. Literally none. It's not liek one has better aim or better damage or more ammo than the later ones. They are all sucky but different form each other. The numbers say they jsut suck in any way. The later guns are the ones that have different stats and are actually good. Now if everyone had only the starter guns this wouldn't be a problem, but since they suck completely when compared to later ones it is a big problem.