mirgro said:
TheRealMafoo said:
mirgro said:
So by your logic no government would be best of all since I'm sure you think your deomestic government is better than your city government, right? You do realize that modern civilization has progressed much farther now, than it ever did when people just lived under city states, right? Just something to think about. Maybe it's not necessarily good for you, but it seems that the human race benefits a lot more, the mroe it is organized, what you are proposing is very close to anarchy.
|
It's true, that no government would mean government was the least posable corrupt, but where did I ever say I didn't want government?
I want the US government to do what they were intended to do. Protect my rights, and protect my country. This is what I pay them to do. This is all I want them to do. The rest, the people can take care of.
I don't need a government to take care of me. I always have taken care of myself. If you on the other hand can not take care of yourself, and you need someone else to do it for you, I can then understand why you like big government.
|
Well wouldn't health automatically fall under "pursuit of happiness?" I mean... how can one pursue happiness without being healthy?
|
Notice that word "pursuit"? That's there for a reason. Happiness is not something to be given to you. It's something you have to go get. It's not hard at all in this country to get health insurance. It's why over 90% of the people who want it, have it.
Now, I think the insurance companies are broken, and I want to fix the problem, but this bill does not of it.
Really only two things need to be done. One is it needs to cost less, and the other is insurance companies need to be held more accountable for droping people who get sick while on a policy with them.
