New editorial about the review system and people who complain about it

[rocketpig]

heedstone said:

rocketpig said:

 "If you can't spend enough time to read a review to see if the reviewer marked off points for a game element that you consider to be a plus, you should really just shut the hell up and not talk about the review. Or maybe you should read the piece and argue the validity of its points. That would be a novel concept."

 

What?  do you want me to actually do posts reviewing the whole review of a reviewer?  

I do read reviews, why else did I buy the magazine?  To look at the pretty pictures?  I bought the magazine, read the reviews and thought that they were a pile of shit.  The scores were just the icing on the cake.

 

I was referring to what you did with my article and compared it to the point of the article, period.

You're not really great at drawing allusions, are you?