| meehan666 said: And wasn't the killzone 2 flamethrower one of the weakpoints of killzone 2's visuals (personally I didn't like the look of the fire and I believe some reviewers thought the same). Anyway, we shouldn't compare fire animation from a flamethrower against a rocket launcher when we can look at explosions made from both games rockets. I haven't seen any video on the web that shows that killzone has the more detailed explosions, and owning both games myself I would have to say Crysis wins here too. |
Many complained the fact that it seemed a "flame-pisser" more than a flame-thrower, pitiful enough that's the way real napalm flamethrowers look like: http://media-2.web.britannica.com/eb-media/67/123167-004-0FF79D60.jpg ------ http://www.warboats.org/images/jpg/StonerPics/stonerzippo.jpg .
Besides that, the point is: the flames in crysis are blatantly sprites and they don't even try to hide that. The flames of Killzone 2 may be not as pretty as the rest of the game, but they are good, technically speaking.
