Lord Flashheart said:
Your post shows me that you are deliberately seeing things in what I'm asking just to validate your hate for change instead of addressing what i'm asking.
3. is a perfect example
"3. Just because something is available doesn't mean your entitled to it. Are you entitled to a mansion if you cannot afford it? Are you entitled to take Peyton Manning's spot at QB simply because that position exists? Should you recieve a McClaren F1 for transportation to work? You assume that without universal healthcare, you will have countless people that die for no reason. I would argue that there are many cheap, affordable ways to keep yourself healthy and fit that can prevent dire illnesses.
You act as if every single person in America gets a crazy disease during their working years, and requires a massive spending program to ensure they survive, and can continue working...Even with our 'bad' health care system, our life expectancy is within a year or two of anywhere else in the developed world - despite having insanely high obesity."
Way to take what I say and blow it completely and ridiculously out of proportion to mock my argument. Well done. Yes everyone should get a McClaren F1 and a mansion.
Now I see the level you are sinking to I'm done with you and the rest of your post.
All I wanted was to understand but you wanted to treat this like I'm a democrat (I guess you are republican) and make something out of this that was unnecessary. Stick to Fox news.
Can anyone else able to keep themselves within the boundries of reality answer my questions please. That is if you aren't dieing of a crazy disease. Preferably someone who's retired. |
For the life of me... I can't tell what your question is.
