Boutros said:
Let's get real here, it's not like he gave the game a 7/10. He gave it 4/10! He knew how people would react to that score. There was no objectivity at all in that review. I expect a lot more objectivity from a reviewer except the fun factor of course which can't really be objective. Personally, I learned not to trust reviews much nowadays but a lot of people do and if Destructoid was not on metacritic, no one would care about that review. Even Bioware directors said FFXIII was at the bottom of their list because they read some reviews and were not impressed with the game. I mean come on! We all know FFXIII is good enough if you like RPGs in general. Plus, when you read his review, I have a really hard time understanding how his arguments justifies the score. He's just whining and complaining about insignificant stuff. It's just trolling at it's best. He's not even the one who made the preview and the guy who made the preview loved the game so far. They just want hits. I think the facts speaks for themselves. I'll just ignore Sterling from now on. /rant |
He wasn't objective... because he didn't change his score based on how people would react.
Do you and I have different definitions of objective here?
As for the insignificant stuff... he complained about the story, gameplay and bosses.
The one positive he had was the graphics...
I mean... what?
