Crysis 2 Versus Killzone 2 Screenshot Comparison

[rocketpig]

hobbit said:

rocketpig said:

hobbit said:

rocketpig said:

gurglesletch said:

mirgro said:
Hillzone 2's textures are all blurry compared to Crysis 2's. If those are not PC shots of C2 then I'd be interested to know how they can have the textures they have with the small amount of RAM that the PS3/360 has.

You have probably never seen how much ram windows uses then.

It's not 1.75 gigs, which is the difference between a PS3 and a modest gaming computer.

Streaming tech and good level design make a big difference to the texture resolutions on the consoles.

Anything that is available on consoles is available on PC... with loads more power, to boot.

so what? the point was RAM isn't the biggest issue for the graphics on consoles these days. Texture res is limited by the texture units and the lack of processing speed needed to allot more time to the texture unit functions. Lets not forget streaming is easier done on a console. PCs have multiple OS, APIs, GPUs, CPUs, HDDs, and different amounts of different speed RAM to deal with.

No, RAM isn't the biggest issue but when your average PC outstrips these consoles in EVERY technical aspect, it's really pointless to compare the PS3 and a PC.

At this point, it's like compared Metroid: Other M to Uncharted 2. What's the point? One machine is massively overpowered compared to the other.

And I'm not the one who brought up RAM to being with...