By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
elticker said:
huaxiong90 said:
fighter said:
huaxiong90 said:
fighter said:
imo sim fans will prefer 60fps, great online features and great physics over better graphics



it was understood that gt5 had better screenshots since years now, i would have prefered another criteria than that in this vs.

Please don't tell me you're trying to imply that FM3 does the mentioned features better than GT5.

 

 

it's pretty obvious i do think so, if you have elements proving otherwise feel free to share

GT5: Prologue ran at 60 frames per second. Safe to assume it'll be the same case with GT5.

 

GT5 will be the first game in the Gran Turismo franchise to include both mechanical and external damage modeling, including a real-time deformation engine that will process model deformation according to the speed and angle of impact. Also, the impressions of the physics engine displayed from the GT: Time Trial academy have generally been positive.

 

http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=6423


that doesnt say in the whole racing history but in the gran turismo franchise and i think forza already have thos features as i get fucked if i crash a car in forza 3 with sim damage on but its very funny and fun whne me and my friend choose land rover and crash it into each other. Btw i heard that forza has the most realistic physics in any racing game that has been released to date thats what i think my impression was from insidesimracing

My point wasn't who did it first. My point is who will do it better. And we can't decide that yet.

 

Thing is, he's talking as if GT5 already released. But him mentioning 60 fps shows he has no clue what he's talking about.

 

@Blue: During Forza's release that is. I don't think they mentioned anything about the GT: Academy Time Trial, which released afterwards.



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!