Dont know much about DRM as I dont play game son the PC, but Ive heard loads of people complaining about it, with the levels of frustrations varying depending on the game.
For DLC, a lot of people on this site complain about it and here I really do not understand. Ok, sometimes there are times when I accept DLC is so pointless it not worth even existing or some content is cut out of a game just to be released later. But most of the time the DLC expands the gaming experience and/or takes in a new direction. Multiplayer Map remakes are branded as 'rip-offs', maybe loads of people liked the version on the old game and now want it on the new one (Halo 3, MW2). Then theres full games Ive seen people have said should be DLC such as Halo 3 ODST(this game wasnt full price where I got it so the American $60 argument doesnt hold up for me) , L4D2 (some people still complain about this even though most have now accept it as not being a rip-off) and the FIFA World Cup 2010. I remember the times before DLC and online gaming, where my games were finished when Id completed the campaign. This is why DLC is not a rip-off in most cases, even if some publishers are taking advantage of it.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
