jarrod said:
Hus said:
jarrod said:
Hus said:
DirtyP2002 said:
The only segment where MS is not as big as Sony are handhelds, because they are not in that business.
|
So in 1st party development they are equall ? and they both own equal amount of game franchises ? or they publish equal amount of games.
LMFAO
|
They have fewer internal studios and put out less games, but their 1st party games seemingly sell better at the same time. It's just a different publishing philosophy (fewer games than sell better), one that Microsoft was pretty vocal about shifting to this gen.
As far as game franchises that MS owns though, they really do have a huge amount of popular legacy brands from Rare and various other studios that are going unused (Crimson Skies, Battletoads, Flight Simulator, Snake Rattle N' Roll, Age of Empires, Blast Corps, MechWarrior/Assault, Shadowrun, Killer instinct, Sabrewulf, Knight Lore, Rise of Nations, Starlancer, Conker, Black & White, R.C. Pro Am, Midtown Madness, PGR, Wizards & Warriors, Jet Force Gemini, etc, etc). In that regard they may actually be comparable to Sony (who also has a lot of dormant brands).
|
Well what are these better selling games, and how mush better do they sale. Just what are they, and come on like Sony does not have load of unused games franchises.
|
Well, Halo. Nothing Sony's published in the past half decade even comes close. Microsoft is pretty strong with secondary brands too, like Fable, Forza and (although not owned by them) Gears of War. Sony release a LOT more content, but sales wise Microsoft's still even with them overall really.
And yeah, Sony has a TON of dormant brands. Parappa / Lammy, Jumping Flash, WildARMs, Arc the Lad, Xai, Intelligent Qube, Jak, Alundra, Lemmings, Destruction Derby, Mark of the Kri, Dark Cloud, Popolocrois, Sly Cooper, Dropship, Omega Boost, Rally Cross, MediEvil, Motor Toon GP, SkyBlazer, Draken, Colony Wars, Shadow of the Beast, Discworld, etc, etc. Lots of missed opportunities for both Sony and MS really imo. :/
|
Do the math.
