jarrod said:
Hus said:
DirtyP2002 said:
The only segment where MS is not as big as Sony are handhelds, because they are not in that business.
|
So in 1st party development they are equall ? and they both own equal amount of game franchises ? or they publish equal amount of games.
LMFAO
|
They have fewer internal studios and put out less games, but their 1st party games seemingly sell better at the same time. It's just a different publishing philosophy (fewer games than sell better), one that Microsoft was pretty vocal about shifting to this gen.
As far as game franchises that MS owns though, they really do have a huge amount of popular legacy brands from Rare and various other studios that are going unused (Crimson Skies, Battletoads, Flight Simulator, Snake Rattle N' Roll, Age of Empires, Blast Corps, MechWarrior/Assault, Shadowrun, Killer instinct, Sabrewulf, Knight Lore, Rise of Nations, Starlancer, Conker, Black & White, R.C. Pro Am, Midtown Madness, PGR, Wizards & Warriors, Jet Force Gemini, etc, etc). In that regard they may actually be comparable to Sony (who also has a lot of dormant brands).
|
