IGN bias against PS3

[slowmo]

LordChris915 said:

twesterm said:

EdStation3 said:

Im assuming you read the title but not the the actual post.

My point is:

If there is a mutliplat where the 360 version is better > IGN makes two review to capitalize on the PS3 version being inferior

 

If there is a multiplat where the PS3 version is better < IGN makes one review to hide the 360 versions inferiority

Can a name a multiplatform game where the PS3 version actually better (I'm not talking negligible things here)?

The only game I can think of is Batman: Arkham Asylum and that's only because of DLC which shouldn't be counted in the first place (and I'm not saying that is the only game, just the only one I can think of off the top of my head).

All multiplatform games are better on the PS3 because I dislike the 360 console so much, it makes me come out in hives from the horrible colour scheme and shoddy workmanship!

It's just personal preference and it's not like I don't like the concept of the 360, there are some games on there I would love to own, sadly I don't believe I need them enough to justify buying such an unreliable piece of junk and for what it is worth, I don't trust Microsoft as far as I could throw them.

Call me a fanboy, it's my right to express my opinion.

He cannot call you a fanboy because he would be in breach of forum rules, even if that was HIS opinion.  The point is you don't have a right to express your opinion however you feel on these forums as you must abide by forum rules.  If you insist on bashing the 360 at every opportunity then sooner rather than later you will get banned for persistant trolling as you don't have a right to insult and annoy other users, even if it is your opinion.

I'll refrain from expressing why I think Sony are a bunch of robbing ****'s from my experiences.  I might not trust them anymore but I'm not going to cut my nose off to spite my face when it comes to enjoying my gaming.