See, even this site is biased against Atari, because it doesn't even give Atari its own spot on here so I could post this comment in it. I am forced to use the Gaming Discussion.
The bias is SOOOO disgusting though. It is so bad that NO A SINGLE SITE NOW, will ever post a single positive review. NOT A SINGLE Jaguar game gets a 10/10 (outside of Goes-to-11, which reminds me, it is time to post at least one Jaguar review on there). This is downright biased. It is so biased that you don't even need me to produce a chart to show it!
It is so disgusting! I am going to demand a boycott of all offensive sites and go on a posting rampage to post ALL offending websites, and let the world know about all the stuff they don't post, and tell the WORLD to not visit URLs. I will actually consider paying for a large ad campaign to do this, to tell the world to not visit the sites, and run them on TV. I will actually also stage a boycott in front of E3 and every other trade show regarding these websites, it will put the Dante's Inferno protest to shame!
And don't give me that they no longer make the Atari Jaguar also, or games for it. This amount of AWESOME can't be contained, and it is obvious to anyone who is willing to DO THE MATH! that 64 bits in the Jaguar is superior, and will be superior foreva! So thus, there is NO EXCUSE to not post 10/10 reviews for the Atari Jaguar games.
See, if you DO THE MATH, it is clear! Well, unless you are partisan marketing monkey (as shown here):
Also, see this sheer awesomeness of THE MATH (if you did it):
See, it even has Aliens vs Predator! This game just came out, and the review sites can't even give the Jaguar version a 10/10. And don't give me that the game came out YEARS ago.... or that it is a different game! Why would the publishers of the game out now name it the same as the Jaguar version, unless they find the Jaguar version SO AWESOME that they need to do inferior version on the PS3 and 360 YEARS LATER? HMMMM?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
