By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Feylic said:
Twistedpixel said:
Feylic said:

I'm gonna have to go with nightsurge on this one, wtf does this mean?

Only people developing or not developing for the PS3 have been called lazy in any great number. So therefore its the lazy machine.

You certainly don't like to make sense do you... The only reason "laziness" has been brought up, is because comparisons can be made between certain games. These comparisons occur primarily between multiplatform games on the 360 and PS3. Multiplatform games are meant to be the same game on two different consoles, so when one of the consoles recieves a lower quality game, people complain that the developers were lazy. I guess you could also call a developer lazy if they released a ridiculously terrible game, but that could just be because they have no budjet or they geniunely just suck. If companies want to release multiplatform games, and get full price for both, then they need to make them the same.

So I don't see in any way how you could consider the developers for GOW 3 lazy. They set out to make an awesome game and a conclusion to a popular trilogy, and from critics and preview videos/pictures it looks like that have.

Just because most people are too naive to call lazyness except on multiplatform games doesn't change anything. I stand firm on my stance, because other people are just too blind to see whats in front of them. Multiplatform games only started to have to be the same in this generation because gamers are whiners. In previous generations developers were never lazy because they always did their best for whatever platforms they had to release games for.

Im just joking with you, you can stop at any time if you want.



Do you know what its like to live on the far side of Uranus?