| Raze said: ya I rescind that, the main controller looked so much like the nunchuck, I glanced it over in the gallery. You explained what kind of body movments cant be tracked, but thats YHO. Show me proof of what one can do better than the other, dont tell me what you believe it can and cant do. Anyone can try to push theory as fact without a source. |
It's my informed opinion based on knowing a bit of hardware details about the wiimote accelerometers (8 bit per axis to cover from -3g to +3g, 100Hz sampling rate) and a fair bit of physics and math. If you want, we can go over the bloody details in a separate discussion, but the endline is very reasonable and rooted in objective reasoning. And I never said that Sony's move will be better: it might turn out to be extremely laggy or sensible to ambient light conditions for all I know.
I said that a system based on an external camera can potentially track accurately in some conditions in which the wiimote hardware will drift, because of the way it is designed. And thus that no, not all "1:1" solutions can be called equally accurate just because they are accurate enough on a subset of movements.
