binary solo said:
You're right about that, but I'd expect gaming journalists to be a bit more on to it with what to expect from a 20% pre-alpha. The legitimate criticism they should raise is the lack of anything to show off that's a lot more developed than 20% pre-alpha a mere 5-6 months from launch. Rather than writing about a pre-alpha as if that's a basis for judging the technical potential of the Move. |
Hold on. So the graphics arn't tip top and the timing isn't perfect, but "the technology itself", at a developers conference FOR DEVELOPERS doesn't actually show proof of concept.
And you're expecting ign to be nice, respectful and polite about it?
Im sorry but i wouldn't expect the same responses that the Wii had 4 years ago, because now they expect more accuracy.
“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.
