This article highlights a bunch of superficial points such as less buttons, no wire, etc. This author is absolutely wrong btw about Wii not being good for FPS games. Metroid Prime Corruption is a fantastic FPS game and the controls work great. I don't get his whole point about SOCOM 4 because Wii already has smoothly running FPS games.
At the heart, Move is nearly identical to Wiimote in function. The only major difference is that Move lets video of the player appear on the screen with the game. There might be some differences in the technology that recognizes the signal, but the function is nearly identical. Even if Move is more accurate than WM+, it will not affect the overall gameplay that much. Nintendo has already discovered how much it has to streamline accurate body movements to make an enjoyable game. If a game required 100% accurate movements, such as Tiger Woods Golf, it probably wouldn't be that fun of a game.
As an owner of both the Wii and PS3 I was quite excited about Move/Wand/Arc. However, the demos showed today are just more of the same. I need to see something really different before I can jump on the Move bandwagon. For example, I would be very interested in a Move game that incorporates
I also own the 360, and Natal looks like a much more unique experience at this point. However, I won't be suprised if Move also incorporates some Natal-like technology in the future.
Most anticipated games of 2011:
Uncharted 3,Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword, Rocksmith
Modern Warfare 3, Super Mario 3D







