| perpride said: I completely agree with your first paragraph. In fact, that's pretty much what I was trying to say. The storage medium on the consoles have almost no relations to game quality. Anything a Blu Ray can handle, you can put on several DVD's. As for the second paragraph...are you serious? Have you seen any head to head comparisons recently? Look at the multiplatform game library that PS3/360 share and tell me which one clearly has the better version of games. You say it was mostly at the beginning of PS3's life cycle. That's somewhat true, but not entirely. Every head to head I've ever seen, up to last month's version, puts 360 ahead in multiplatform titles. Also, for anyone in this thread still thinking Square made a stupid decision bringing the game to 360, you should look at what Brett posted in the news section today. If you are lazy, I will tell you. If we only count PS3 sales, FFXIII had less fw sales than FFXII. But when you add in the 360, FFXIII is on track to have a better sales openning week than FFXII was. According to the owner of this site, that is clearly because it is multiplatform: http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=7369&mp=1 |
Ok great to read that! I always read review, borderland and dragon age both have good points on PS3. Darksiders runs the same, thats the name I have on top of my heads. Im sure we can find more, but yes, 360 has more multiplatform that runs best overall. My point was that port are getting better and better and that 90% is not true anymore. My other point was that we cannot evaluate the power of a console based on a multiplatform games, im sure we agree on that. On another note, great that it sells that much, it will encourage them to make great games.
