Kreshnik said:
are you kidding me? the demo was great, but not perfect. nor will be the final game - sorry, but a perfect game needs more than Kratos on the cover. (its still one of the best games of its genre though) GOW is a great series, may deserve a 9/10 from gaming-sites and a 8/10 from me. there will most likely never be a game which "deserves" a perfect score. you know the meaning of perfect, dont you? (most review sites most likely dont, they review like: 10=awesome, 9=great, 8=good, 7=average, 6=bad, 5=very bad...) |
All I'm saying is both of yous don't know what the game is like until yous play it so neither of yous can comment on a score. Also to say a game deserves a certain score before you even play it makes you biased no matter which way you look at it. Also your going by a demo that was made a year ago seriously?
Look I'm not saying the games perfect. I don't know what its like and I also don't know if it deserves a 10 either but your jumping ahead of yourself man. Nobody said the games perfect. You brought that up all by yourself. He did say the game deserves a 10 and as you stated most reviewers consider that awesome.
Now to get onto the subject of this thread. IGN gave the xbox 360 version of Fallout 3 a 96 and it gave the PS3 version of Fallout 3 a 94. I know exactly what the OP's talking about because both versions of Fallout 3 had a lot of bugs so why the extra marks for the 360 version there?







