highwaystar101 said:
I know what it means. But to use the definition you gave "a disbelief in the efficacy or value of therapy, as of drugs, psychotherapy, etc", I believe that it is generally accepted in the medical community that homeopathy is not an effective treament, nor do they recognise the value of it. If a treatment is not effective or the value is not recognised, like homeopathy, then it falls under the banner of "therapeutic nihilism". I don't see how it falls under overtreatment, sorry. Either way, it can be seen as directly conflicting with the hypocratic oath. |
Theraputic Nihilism is the pitfall they try and avoid... themselves. They try to avoid over treating a patient, and to believe that nothing can help a patient.
Hence why h omeopaty wouldn't fall under there.
Your using the term completly backwords in otherwords.
Not believing homeopathy does anything actually is theraputic nihilism... though a justified form.
Examples to show my point.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/61/4/592
http://www.dermanities.com/detail.asp?article=172
Theraputic Nihilism counts as overtreatment because it's a treatment which has little effect.








