amp316 said:
radiantshadow92 said:
amp316 said:
radiantshadow92 said:
amp316 said:
radiantshadow92 said:
haxxiy said:
According to this thread, I need to train hard to win the lottery... :P |
lol good one, but seriously though, i disagree, MK doesnt really involve too much skill....and there is nothing wrong with that
|
And how many times have you actually played the game?
|
a good number of times, i used to be a huge fan of the 64 version, and ive played the wii version quite a bit, i love it, but i wish it was pushed farther, but either way its a great game, but what is the problem with it not relying on skill? why does it have to rely on skill anyways?...its a good game none the less and its easily accessible to anyone that likes fun racing games
|
Have you read a single thing that I wrote? The game relies heavily on skill.
Is it accessible? Yes, but in order to excel at the game it takes hours upon hours of practice. It is easy to play but it takes a borerline maniac to master. This is true with most good Nintendo games.
|
i have read what you posted, but you just cannot prove the game takes skill just like i cant prove that it doesnt take skill...and you didnt answer my question...so i will ask again...what is the problem with the game not relying on skill?
|
It could easily be proven that the game involves skill. If you played any of the people that I mentioned, you would lose unless you have logged at least 100 hours in the game. I didn't answer your question since I don't have to answer it. The game does rely on skill. If it didn't, it would be a completely different game like Mario Party, Rock Paper Scissors, or the latest Prince of Persia game.
|
i dont see why its so important for the game to require skill, seriously, you act like the game is bad because it requires luck
