By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Twistedpixel said:
joeorc said:

I think noone is not saying that, At least I hope not the Game I think will be d@mn fantastic in thne graphic's department.

you may be suprised:

you do know his background is a Programmer himself.he was developing game's since he was 12 year's old. in the late 80's he was making game's simulation's on the C64 at 12 year's old

the first  crysis was a graphic's beast an I see this one will also, but I think what Yurli was mainly talking about is that Right now in development

they are all going to be pretty d@mn good, the slight running better is just that Slight that it would in most likely not even matter because the feeling of all three when playing the game will be the same.

The feeling of all three? Hell no! PC gamers will have better graphics, display options (3D or surround or BOTH), better framerates and an interface which suits open world games a little better.

Btw when he said 'Running better' the context was the individual parts of the game. The full statement was in brief that the game would run better on 360 in certain areas and run better on PS3 in certain areas but the way the game splits the workload is unique to each.

how so?

your playing a game that will have the same story element, just because the PC could have better display option's and as for framrate's I doubt that unless you have a much better graphic's card and ram which to get the best result's for a game like that is very dependent on not just that but also your CPU.

not all PC gamer's will have those best spec's, some will but not everyone.

and suit's open world better is subjective on each gamer's taste's .

that's why it's a mult-platform engine so it can, and it does not take advantage of any of platform's strength's , except for PC that IS.



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.