...Why do people continue to argue with Manus? We know that he doesn't pay attention to answers, and he never tries to make logical arguments. The last time I argued with him on Healthcare, he never actually answered any questions, just made arguments without listening.
Also, for his various Bible verses:
He totally missed the point. He is arguing that the whatever version he quoted managed to translate the source correctly.
For example, his Chronicles 16:30 quote:
1 Chronicles 16:30: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.”
That is merely the translation. The actual Hebrew can be interpreted far differently:
FearH2342 beforeH4480 H6440 him, allH3605 the earth:H776 the worldH8398 alsoH637 shall be stable,H3559 that it be notH1077 moved.H4131
Now, lets look at H3559, H1077 and H4131:
H3559
כּוּן
kûn
koon
A primitive root; properly to be erect (that is, stand perpendicular);. hence (causatively) to set up, in a great variety of applications, whether literal (establish, fix, prepare, apply), or figurative (appoint, render sure, proper or prosperous): - certain (-ty), confirm, direct, faithfulness, fashion, fasten, firm, be fitted, be fixed, frame, be meet, ordain, order, perfect, (make) preparation, prepare (self), provide, make provision, (be, make) ready, right, set (aright, fast, forth), be stable, (e-) stablish, stand, tarry, X very deed.
H1077
בּל
bal
bal
From H1086; properly a failure; by implication nothing; usually (adverbially) not at all; also lest: - lest, neither, no, none (that . . . ), not (any), nothing.
H4131
מוט
môṭ
mote'
A primitive root; to waver; by implication to slip, shake, fall: - be carried, cast, be out of course, be fallen in decay, X exceedingly, fall (-ing down), be (re-) moved, be ready shake, slide, slip.
Now, given the actual meanings of the words, what kind of interpretation should one derive? I am not a rocket scientist, but given the actual meanings of the words, its either figurative, or the litteral sense is arguing that the current orbit of the earth is 'firm'. I really think H4131 is very interesting, as the word has direct correlation to many terms used in astronomy. Manus really took it out of context.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.







