joeorc said:
selnor said:
joeorc said:
selnor said:
joeorc said:
selnor said:
joeorc said:
DirtyP2002 said:
it is crazy to see how people just do not want them to be Xbox 360 screenshots.
|
I do not think that is the case at all, the point being The OP is saying that the only screen's out there are fhe xbox360's only, which is not the Case at all.
IGN had already put up the screen's for the PS3 also. which is exctly like these screen's. so if anything it's the exact same screen shot's. that's the point.
it's not just the xbox360's.
|
Ive provided multiple links and reasons why this PS3 mag is lying. And even PC magazine from Frbruary with the exact same pics says it's 360 version. LOL. PC mag tells the truth, PS3 mag found out. LOL.
|
so let me get this straight, one magazine is lying the other is telling the truth..?
You know IF he print's false Information in the magazine , they could be liable for breaking NDA, or other said information leaked to the public without express OK from EA.
so let's ignore the information from the Mag , about the SUIT with commont's from Yuri abouit How the suit interact's with the player while the player play's the game, what the effect's are. Where did the information come from so the magazine could print it.?
so are you going to Say EA ..said "just use the xbox360 build"?
|
It's simple. Every research via google, or Bing fr instance when trying to find PS3 version shown in February has none. It even actually comesup with 360 version shown under PS3 search but no PS3 version shown. And PC mags tell they were shown 360 version in Feb. Other PS3 media say 360 version shown. PC mag fwith the exact same scans as PS3 mag say it was 360 verion shown. IT's one magazine claiming they are PS3 screens. Do they actually say PS3 screens in the PS3 article? Or is it they didnt say anything and people are assuming it was PS3 version even though many reports say otherwise.
|
Why are you asking me?
your the one who said they were not telling the truth.
If you had read the magazine instead of claiming something you know nothing about you would have you own answer.
unless you don't own a PS3 or even care to own one nor find out anything that has to do with the PS3.
unless it's negative information about the PS3 that is, is that the only Information you care about for the PS3 ?
|
On the contrary. I did not bring the magazine up. I am asking the people that did. Because their is a wealth of info showing that it wasnt the PS3 version. These people are trying to discredit the version shown in OP. 1 magazine, versus loads of websites and PC magazines of the very same pics.
|
do not try to sneak past this issue:
you have no IDEA because you did not read the Magazine your self.
and everyone know's the internet is the only place for factual information...
got to love the interweb's
look , I ubderstand you love the xbox360, no harm in that I like the xbox360 also, I just think making judgement's as fast as you are without even reading the PS3 magazine just show's your not being open to the IDEA that maybe just Maybe their telling you something that you may not have known.
that is if you even care to . which it seem's you do not care at all.
So once again HOW do you know the Magazine is not telling the truth , unless you read it?
|
You have completely missed the discussion.
People used the PS3 mag to say that the screens were not 360 screens. And that the first version shown was PS3.
I have showed a multitude of evidence why that cannot be possible.
Regardless of reading the magazine or not. I am showing if they said what others claim the mag said then the mag is lying. If it didnt claim that then the forum posters are lying.
You would do well to read the thread before accusations.
