scottie on 05 March 2010
| Reasonable said: I have to say this caught me by surprise. Given the game is technically fine, then for me it's at least limped to a 5 or 6 out of 10 right there. Reading the review I'm really surprised they didn't go for a 7 - which would be game is fine technically and okay for the genre but nothing special. A 5 means the game has serious issues, which is pretty much going against the general views which seem to be the game is fine if somewhat linear and nothing new. |
Actually, edge uses 5 to mean average, rather than the '7 is average' that most sites use. That is the one good thing that can be said about edge. Pity their reviewers are actually chimpanzees trained to hit the numbers 4, 5, 6 and 7 on a keyboard in random orders
