Sharky54 said:
everdom said:
Sharky54 said:
everdom said:
Sharky54 said:
No surprise here. A incompetent developer refusing to make games on a system they just aren't good enough to make games on. |
You sir are a moron.
Sorry if thats banworthy but really saying Valve is incompetent for not releasing PS3 games is like saying "wow that company that is making shitloads of money is totally doing it wrong LoL!!11!!1!"
|
no sir. As I recall. Someone at valve said the PS3 was too hard to program for. And that they wouldn't make any games for it. If it is too hard for them. Thats fine. Just means they aren't a great developer.
Also. Last I checked. They don't make nearly as much money as many companies that do make games for the PS3.
|
Please name just one of these companies?? Because all i see is companies that arent sponsored or first party bleeding money everywhere. Valve has steam - a great hulking money making machine, and they make some of the best games period.
|
I personally think portal is the only worthwhile game they have ever made. Also I assumed we were just talking about money from games. Because valve games don't really sell that amazingly. Gamestop makes more money the steam. How about that? Truth of the matter is. They said it would be too hard to design games for. That shows me they suck. If you bring your car to be fixed. And the guys says "I am sorry, this car is too complicated for me to work on" would you say your friends should go there for work on their cars? I doubt it.
|
And you have sales data for steam and Valve? Quit talking out of your asshole, they don't want to develop for PS3 cause the PS3 is unnecessarily hard, the dev kit sucks, and they are a PC based developer. QQ some more, it's a free country they don't have to do shit if they don't want to, and they are still laughing all the way to the bank.
