Rath said:
Unless something is repeatable and verifiable it should not be considered. Every single story of 'angels' or 'demons' is anecdotal, there are no controlled studies and no verefied reports. They are almost all witnessed by reasonably small groups and are more easily explained by psychological effects rather than by otherwordly forces. Claiming that we are deluding ourselves because we don't believe an anecdote told by somebody who we don't even know is silly. |
That's not really true. A number of sciences rely on stuff that can't be strictly repeatble due to their nature. In addition, it's rather hard to repeat something when you don't know the exact cause. In fact most theories are formed and often supported WELL before any expierment is concieved that could or could not prove it.
As for verifiable... that I could eaisly accomplish.








