SciFiBoy said:
Kasz216 said:
SciFiBoy said:
Kasz216 said:
Clearly.
You can't come up with a logical reason for something to have happened. Yet still try and come up with silly details that anyone with half a brain would of thought of. "Something holds the door open when it needs to be open."
Really?
That guy lived in that house until he was about 25. I had plenty of chances to look at the door and try and figure out what happened.
You're the kind of person who could see something unexplainable with witnesses... come up and dismiss all possibilities and still be skeptical...
It's a VERY unscientific stance and very delusional.
The difference is... rather then being delusional to the fantastic... it's being delusional to what you know. It's fairly common. Scientists who stood in the way of scientific progress often try to explain away things that show their theories are wrong and stand in the way of progress in such cases.
They've always been proven wrong when new discoveries were aloud to be made by those who weren't so close minded.
Calling someone dellusional when they actually apply a scientific approach to figuring something out... is in fact delusional.
|
your whole argument assumes I am to believe your story, I see no reason to do so as it asserts something that you cant even prove...
|
Now saying you don't believe me is a much better position.
Still problematic however since I think i've generally show myself to be a reliable person when it comes to relating the facts.
I would say your not believing me would be soley based on your wanting to not believe me.
Either way, lets switch positions, and say this happened to you, and you went through every logical solution and found none... and then I called you delusional. What would be your reaction?
|
It hasnt happened to me though, nor am I claiming it did
unless it does happen to me, (yeah...right...) I cant possibly comment on my reaction, but im smart enough to know that if I couldnt explain it then people wouldnt believe me
|
It appears the difference between you and I... is that you are closeminded... which is ironic since you like to claim youself a person of science... which is about exlaining the unknown.
Since you are unwilling to admit or accept the fact that some things ARE unknown.
