| windbane said: Apple can brag all they want but the fact remains that every single benchmark for over a decade showed that the fastest Intel processors were faster than the fastest Apple processors. Except for some video editing and photoshop applications. I'll give you that. Anyway I never said I believed the Xbox was more powerful than the Wii. The Xbox didn't blow away the last generation so if the Wii is only slightly (1.5 to 2 is slightly to me) better than it's not much of an improvement. All reports thus far point to the fact that the CPU and GPU on the Wii are modified gamecube stuff, so it's not much better. I think we basically agree on the power here. My point is that it's nowhere near PS3 or 360 and the Wii is much closer to last-gen than any previous console generation. No matter how you argue the architecure and special features, the Wii has low specs. |
NO YOU'RE WRONG!
READ THIS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC#RISC_and_x86
AND THEN:
http://cse.stanford.edu/class/sophomore-college/projects-00/risc/risccisc/
i can't believe that there are still people that don't know difference between cisc and risc!!!!!
study also how core2 due really works.
but this isn't a topic on cpus...
if you compare cpus only on mhz...sorry you're are wrong...
i don't have time t explain why your are wrong so go on wikipedia to find answers!!!!!
