ManusJustus said:
When will the inaccuracies stop, Kasz? We already made it clear that tax deductions and promotion of self interests makes what conservatives give as less, such as a rich businessman who donates because he wants a building or community center named after him or religous people who donate because they think they will recieve rewards after they die. You also fail to realize that liberal areas are also more expensive areas to live in. Liberals tend to live in urban areas and conservatives tend to live in rural areas, meaning that liberals have to pay more money for living expenses. A conservative who buys a house in rural Wyoming has a lot more money left over than a liberal who buys a house in San Francisco. |
Whenever you stop proporting them? Your entire premise is HILARIOUSLY faulty as had already been pointed out.
Your reaching at cherry picking and bs just to hold on to your sad attempts to feel superieror despite the data showing otherwise when it comes to charity.
Your reaching, your gripping and just... generally wrong as you try and use extreme cherry pick... hypotheticals... which really are nothing more then hypotheticals. Yeah, i'm sure all the conservative donations were rich buisness men for publicity.
Even though you claim libearls also make more money. Funny how that works.
You know what happens when you donate to charity... often times it makes you feel good, should charity suddenly only count when you feel like shit when donating?