nordlead said:
you mean price fixing. They were putting out blu-ray players at the time that had no extra memory so they couldn't even use those features. All they had to do was say impliment everything but instead they said no cause we don't think you'll do it. At the time they didn't even allow Vizio to make blu-ray players and they make some of the best equipment but undercut the other guys buy quite a bit. Besides, they finally did allow the liscense so obviously it wasn't that big a deal, but the held out to keep prices high. You can defend them all you want, but the BDA is in no way a good group of people. They rushed their crap onto the market so they could compete with HD-DVD then put out 1.2 & 1.3 so people would have to upgrade if they bought a 1.1 player that didn't have a powerful enough processor. The only reason I bought a blu-ray player was because they killed HDDVD. |
No, the profiles were progressing and there were dates set to require newly produced players to be 1.2 and 1.3. It wasnt the intent to get double buys on players base don profiles but when these companies have that much invested it was important to get the product out as soon as possible...thats not the topic at hand, the topic at hand is whethee or not they were deliberately keeping prices inflated.....and during a format war the fact you think they would risk such a thing when Toshiba had weekly firesales at artifically low prices just to compete is laughable.
And for th elife of me i cant understand how you can say they price fixed during a format war and still won. And calling BD crap in light of HD DVD is fucking laughable just like the lossy audio and terrible codecs that my Blu-rays had to suffer to equal the lowest common denominator of HD DVD when HD DVD was still limping around.